Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 29373: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trun
From: Bill Meier <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:41:53 -0400
[email protected] wrote:

 	don't give up, as we'll just skip the bad item and move on to
 	the next item.

The dissector "skips to the next" using the bad tag length so I thought 
it better to not try to keep on dissecting.
Would using the expected length to skip to the next be an appropriate 
alternative ??  (Can't say I really like that either ....)