Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Help on ASN2Wrs
From: "Kukosa, Tomas" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:03:05 +0200
Hello Joerg,

I am not sure what you mean (what to implement and where).
MIBs are not compiled with asn2wrs.

Could you explain it in more details? I am not very familiar with SNMP
and MIBs.

Best regards,
  Tomas


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:56 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Help on ASN2Wrs
> 
> Hello Tomas,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:22:40AM +0100, Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
> > PS: I am sorry that the asn2wrs.py is not very readable and 
> would need
> > code cleaning and probably few refactorings. But when I 
> started to write
> > it (based on Aaron S. Lav's PyZ3950 package) I was not able 
> to imagine
> > how much of ASN.1 complexicity we would need to have implemented.
> 
> Which reminds me of a favour I wanted to ask of you :-)
> Could you please implement the BITS element used in SNMP MIB files?
> I have some files and traces that would benefit from decoding the
> value bits. As I have no idea how much work I'm asking you to do
> just let me know whether it's feasable.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>   Joerg
> 
> -- 
> Joerg Mayer                                           
> <[email protected]>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just 
> stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> ______________________________________________________________
> _____________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              
> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
>