Hi,
Gryphon is now the example used. Also referred in README.plugins
Thanx,
Jaap
Sent from my iPhone
On 25 feb 2009, at 17:16, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:38:29PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
It is of little use to keep single file dissectors as plugins. Also
little or no
development is going into these. In order to cut down the number of
plugins
these are incorporated into the build in collection.
What is left is:
1. gryphon, as the most senior plugin providing an example for new
developers.
It is referenced in doc/README.plugins.
2. Multiple file dissector plugins (like profinet) are left as they
are, since
the explicit collection of relevant source files has its pros.
IIRC, the rudp dissector was left in because it was a very simple
dissector
that could act as a trivial example on how to implement such a thing.
Maybe you could restore it?
Apart from that: I'm very happy with your move as it slightly
accelerates
the build and install processes.
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx
>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff
that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
