On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:09:37PM +0100, Anders Broman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:33:26PM +0100, Anders Broman wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I have checked in a fix in revision 2731, formally I think the frame
> >> is wrongly Encoded as the tag [3] is missing but from comments in the
> >> code It looks like this is common
[...]
cristian: is there a way that ws shows some warning that:
- the actual encoding is broken (i.e. not standard, in our case UNIVERSAL
tag is used instead of the CONTEXT one which is forced by the
definition)
- it is (heuristically) trying to decode the message anyway?
thanks a lot!
bye now!
cristian
