From: wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 52
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, 24 November, 2008, 12:29 PM
Send Wireshark-dev mailing list submissions to
wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
wireshark-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 26829: /trunk-1.0/ /trunk-1.0/:
manuf (Jaap Keuter)
2. Re: [Suspected Spam] Help on Building wireshark (Anders Broman)
3. Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 26829: /trunk-1.0/ /trunk-1.0/:
manuf ( Stig Bj?rlykke )
4. Problem in wireshark packet captured (prashanth s)
5. Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 26829: /trunk-1.0/ /trunk-1.0/:
manuf (Jaap Keuter)
6. Wireshark on windows build error (Ru)
7. Re: Wireshark on windows build error (Graham Bloice)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:22:43 +0100
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 26829:
/trunk-1.0/ /trunk-1.0/: manuf
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <492A5643.7000705@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
> 2008/11/23 <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Log:
>> [Automatic manuf update for 2008-11-23]
>>
>> Directory: /trunk-1.0/
>> Changes Path Action
>> +196 -2516 manuf Modified
>
> I think we need r25867 in the 1.0 svn tree to get a correct manuf.
>
>
....although this comes dangerously close to backporting an enhancement.
Thanx,
Jaap
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:11:55 +0100
From: "Anders Broman" <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Suspected Spam] Help on Building
wireshark
To: "Developer support list for Wireshark"
<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<E48F3A0F80C4B642BF6A5FF3257DFBB9053E0347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Anders,
I tried several ways but with no success.I have MICROSOFT
VISUAL STUDIO 2005 and 2003 in my machine.Setting which one
should solve my problem.i have setting as MSVC_VARIANT=MSVC2005.
But still when i try to start wireshark it gives fail to initialze
error message.
Br
Tulip
Hi,
>From the log it appers you ar building with MSVC 8
#"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio
8\VC\BIN\nmake.exe" / "
have you made the corresponding setting in config.nmake?
Regards
Anders
________________________________
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of tulip neo
Sent: den 24 november 2008 07:55
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Suspected Spam] [Wireshark-dev] Help on Building wireshark
Hi List,
Good Morning.
I m new to building wireshark locally.
I followed all steps in wireshark building process.
when i try to build wireshark i dont get any errors but in some cases it
says "0 files copied".
when i use dependency walker it says
MSVCR90.dll :Error opening the file can not find file specified.
MSJAVA.dll :Error opening the file can not find file specified.
When i try to start profile in Dependency walker wuth MSVCR90.dll as
argument.
I get error "The Pllication failed to initialize
properly(0xc0150002).Click ok to terminate.
Its same error that i get when i normally start wireshark.exe.
Also in log i get error as follows:
Error: The Side-by-Side configuration information for
"c:\wsdev\wireshark-gtk2\LUA5.1.DLL" contains errors.
This application
has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect.
Reinstalling the application may fix this problem (14001).
Error: At least one required implicit or forwarded dependency was not
found.
Warning: At least one delay-load dependency module was not found.
Warning: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing
export function in a delay-load dependent module.
Second chance exception 0xC0150002 (Unknown) occurred in "NTDLL.DLL"
at
address 0x7C96478E.
Can any one have a look to this and suggest.I have read lots of
discussion on list specialy discussion made by avik and snders but could
not resolve my problem.I have also attached my build log as text file as
attachment..
Br
tulip
________________________________
Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now
<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_mail_2/*http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo
/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20081124/e3102564/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:15:26 +0100
From: " Stig Bj?rlykke " <stig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 26829:
/trunk-1.0/ /trunk-1.0/: manuf
To: "Developer support list for Wireshark"
<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<46bcbd8f0811240115t6999acc2p9e8bbf2ec1f1e07c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
2008/11/24 Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
> > I think we need r25867 in the 1.0 svn tree to get a correct manuf..
>
> ...although this comes dangerously close to backporting an enhancement..
I know. But we already included the "new" manuf in our 1.0 release,
and we should not remove enhancements already included.
--
Stig Bj?rlykke
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:11:16 +0530
From: "prashanth s" <prbanglore@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Problem in wireshark packet captured
To: "Developer support list for Wireshark"
<wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<69c5cf210811240241y590b9201i112cfa7ce37f8f1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
I am capturing the Gmail traffice on wireshark. However for HTTP POST
messages I get in the Protocol Column of wireshar, IP as the protocol name.
And Info column of wireshark reads as "Bogus IP length (0, less than
header
length 20). Destination reads like "Sonicwal_**:**:** "
And HTTP POST is actually seen under the tree node "Trailer" under
the
subtree "Ethernet II "
It should actually be decoding as TCP and under TCP it should be HTTP.
Instead I am seeing IP.
However this has been happening after I installed windows. Earlier I used
to have linux. I never faced any such problems in captured file.
What may be the problem behind this?
If any of you could you assist me with your answers it would be great for
me.
Regards,
Prashanth
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20081124/da54b0c5/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:52:14 +0100
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 26829:
/trunk-1.0/ /trunk-1.0/: manuf
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <C734F841-AF29-4CC7-BB64-799D6FF0C311@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
On 24 nov 2008, at 10:15, "Stig Bj?rlykke" <stig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> 2008/11/24 Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
>>> I think we need r25867 in the 1.0 svn tree to get a correct manuf.
>>
>> ...although this comes dangerously close to backporting an
>> enhancement.
>
> I know. But we already included the "new" manuf in our 1.0
release,
> and we should not remove enhancements already included.
> --
> Stig Bj?rlykke
>
True, so we'll let it slide this time :)
Thanx,
Jaap
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:17:25 -0800
From: Ru <eruwini@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark on windows build error
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:
<427065260811240417r4b5147catfbdcb1b140b3869d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi ,
I am buiding wireshark source code on windows xp pro.
nmake in verify tools is different to which is given in developer guide....
my output is as follows. why nmake doesn't show the correct visual studio
path ? how to solve it?
Checking for required applications:
cl: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 8/VC/BIN/cl
link: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio
8/VC/BIN/link
nmake: nmake
bash: /usr/bin/bash
bison: /usr/bin/bison
flex: /usr/bin/flex
env: /usr/bin/env
grep: /usr/bin/grep
/usr/bin/find: /usr/bin/find
perl: /usr/bin/perl
C:\Python26\python.exe: /cygdrive/c/Python26/python.exe
sed: /usr/bin/sed
unzip: /usr/bin/unzip
wget: /usr/bin/wget
C:\Wireshark>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20081124/846198cb/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:29:43 +0000
From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark on windows build error
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <492A9E37.8050107@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Ru wrote:
> Hi ,
> I am buiding wireshark source code on windows xp pro.
> nmake in verify tools is different to which is given in developer
> guide...
> my output is as follows. why nmake doesn't show the correct visual
> studio path ? how to solve it?
>
> Checking for required applications:
> cl: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 8/VC/BIN/cl
> link: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio
> 8/VC/BIN/link
> nmake: nmake
> bash: /usr/bin/bash
> bison: /usr/bin/bison
> flex: /usr/bin/flex
> env: /usr/bin/env
> grep: /usr/bin/grep
> /usr/bin/find: /usr/bin/find
> perl: /usr/bin/perl
> C:\Python26\python.exe: /cygdrive/c/Python26/python.exe
> sed: /usr/bin/sed
> unzip: /usr/bin/unzip
> wget: /usr/bin/wget
> C:\Wireshark>
Did you call vcvars.bat in your cmd prompt before running verify tools?
That sets the path for the MS toolchain. See section 2.2.6 of the
Developers Guide.
--
Regards,
Graham Bloice
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20081124/8f0c0089/attachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
End of Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 52
*********************************************
