On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:29:54 +0200, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> That was talk about c-ares as replacement for adns. It came out on top of
> my
> preference list (further candidates: UDNS and posadis). I have had no
time
> to
> investigate this any further, let alone start design/implementation.
It looks like the c-ares community reacted pretty quickly to the DNS
poisoning flaw discovered recently
(http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/mail/c-ares-archive-2008-07/) while
the ADNS community hasn't (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/MIMG-7ECL5U).
This is probably a good hint that we should switch.
