Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25485:/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk
From: "Anders Broman" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:20:27 +0200

Hi,

I moved the expert item inside of the IF statement instead.

Regards

Anders

 


Från: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] För Martin Mathieson
Skickat: den 19 juni 2008 14:38
Till: [email protected]
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25485:/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-per.c

 

You just beat me to it.
I wondered if there should be a continue or return following the PER_NOT_DECODED_YET at line 1868?

Martin

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:36 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=25485

User: stig
Date: 2008/06/19 05:36 AM

Log:
 Initialize new_offset.

Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
 Changes    Path            Action
 +1 -0      packet-per.c    Modified

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits