Should the fact that the "Older Versions" section in
http://www.gtk.org/download-linux.html
does not show anyone bellow 2.4 be taken as a hint on what to do?
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Bill Meier <wmeier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Guy Harris wrote:
>
> > Ulf Lamping wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> So there are not that many places that could show problems here - the
> >> problem we have seems to be a lack of tests if GTK 2.0/2.2 is still running.
> >>
>
> One data point:
>
> The GTK+ version distribution in Wireshark bug reports not specifying
> Windows as the OS and which give the GTK version is as follows:
>
> 1 GTK+ 2.0 [2006-11-03]
> 3 GTK+ 2.2 [2005-10-28]
> [2006-05-03]
> [2008-02-17]
> 64 GTK+ 2.4
> 144 GTK+ 2.6
> 4 GTK+ 2.7
> 114 GTK+ 2.8
> 158 GTK+ 2.10
> 2 GTK+ 2.11
> 149 GTK+ 2.12
> 1 GTK+ 2.15
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
