Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New proto_add_bits function (Was:rev 21556:/trunk/epan//tr..
From: Richard van der Hoff <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:53:23 +0100
Anders Broman wrote:
Sounds good to me,
Committed, in revision 25074.

I've been considering if we need
Different proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val()s
for 8 16 32 and 64 bits what do you think?
My main thought is that yet more proto_tree_add_* functions are likely 
to be more confusing than what you gain by allowing different types of 
return_value param. But... YMMV.