Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Redback Lawful Intercept Dissector
From: Andrew Feren <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks.  I tried to check the bugs this morning, but unfortunately the site was not working for me.  I'll check again in a bit.
-Andrew Feren
 [email protected]

----- Original Message ----
From: Michael A. McCartney <[email protected]>
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:04:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Redback Lawful Intercept Dissector


See http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2376

There is a proposed one line fix for that EOH issue,
and I had same question about where is the protocol


Andrew Feren wrote:
> I've recently started getting a number of false positive hits from the new
> Redback Lawful Intercept heuristic.  I was going to try and tighten up the
> heuristic a bit, but I can't find any sort of protocol specification.
> Basically I use some protocols that start with a 32 bit version number. 
> However since the version numers are all well below 65,535 the first two
> bytes are always 0.  The Redback heuristic sees this as an end of header
> marker and returns true.
> My thought was to return false if the first avptype is an end of header
> marker, but without a protocol spec I can't be sure that this is actually an
> invalid redback packet.
> Anyone have any more details?
> -Andrew
> -Andrew Feren
>  [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]