Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Can't see my protocol in "Decode As ..." menu
From: "Glenn Shirley" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:36:20 +1100
Hi Anders (et. al.),

My protocol is based on an RTP payload type (e.g. 100) so my dissector_add
is as follows:

---
static enum { RTP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_PIRP = 100 };

void proto_reg_handoff_pirp(void)
{
	static gboolean initialised = FALSE;

	if (!initialised)
	{
		pirp_handle = create_dissector_handle(dissect_pirp,
proto_pirp);
	}

	dissector_add("rtp.pt", RTP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_PIRP, pirp_handle);
}
----

As mentioned before this was all working on a windows build but that was a
long time ago so I may have forgotten something.  Apart from my
packet-<proto>.c file and an appropriate entry in a Makefile was there
something else that needed to be done?

Regards,
Glenn.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Anders Broman
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2008 4:33 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Can't see my protocol in "Decode 
> As ..." menu
> 
> Hi,
> How are your dissectors registered?
> dissector_add("udp.port",...)?
> 
> If your packets are recognised as RTP you may wish to 
> register the dissectors with the RTP dissector (see packet-h264.c).
> Regards
> Anders 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Glenn Shirley
> Sent: den 22 januari 2008 10:31
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Can't see my protocol in "Decode As ..." menu
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm currently building Wireshark on CentOs 4 and trying to 
> add in my own protocols.  
> 
> My build appears fine but when I run my newly built version 
> of Wireshark I can see my protocols in the "Analyze | Enabled 
> protocols" list but they aren't visible under the "Decode as" menu.
> 
> My build on Win32 runs fine.
> 
> These protocols are really just different RTP payloads.  
> 
> Is there something special that has to be done on Linux 
> compared to Win32?
> Any hints as to where to start looking appreciated!
> 
> Regards,
> Glenn.
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.8/1236 - Release Date:
> 21/01/2008
> 8:23 PM
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.9/1238 - Release 
> Date: 22/01/2008 8:12 PM
>  
> 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.9/1238 - Release Date: 22/01/2008
8:12 PM