Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you w

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral

From: Stig Bjørlykke <stig.bjorlykke@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:22:18 +0100

On 19. nov.. 2007, at 15.35, Graeme Lunt wrote:

Can you run P7 over RTSE?


I don't know yet.  I just know we have some P7 encoding somewhere :)

Actually, my intention is to go the other way - I want to rename x411,
x420 and s4406 (to p1, p22, and p772 respectively) - this makes more
sense (to me) for protocol filtering etc, and aligns with the
disp/dap/dop/dsp naming.


Yup.  I'll vote for p1, p22 and p772.


--
Stig Bjørlykke

References:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported
  - From: john dite
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported
  - From: Graeme Lunt
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported
  - From: Stig Bjørlykke
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported
  - From: Graeme Lunt

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 23471:/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/:packet-frame.c packet-sctp.c
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Distributing a wireshark dissector
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector for OID:2.6.0.2.5 not implemented. Contact Etheral developers if you want this supported
Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] FSCB3 dissector field names
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread