Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 23428:/trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors
From: "Anders Broman" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:45:29 +0100
The g_warning() was my fault and should be fixed in 
I've sent a mail to the author about the other problem.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher
Sent: den 13 november 2007 05:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 23428:/trunk/
/trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.commonpacket-tpncp.c
/trunk/packaging/nsis/: wireshark.nsi/trunk/tpncp/: tpncp.dat /trunk/:
Makefile.am Makefile.nmake

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:23:26PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=23428
> User: etxrab
> Date: 2007/11/11 01:23 PM
> Log:
>  From Valery Sigalov:
>  New dissector for TPNCP protocol.
>  http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1853

This check-in created two messages on the console when I start Wireshark
in Unix:

20:57:13          Warn filepath /usr/local/src/wireshark/tpncp/tpncp.dat
Duplicate field detected in call to proto_register_field_array:
channel_id is already registered

The Warn is from a simple g_warning() call, but I don't know how to
dissector works in relation to the .dat file to know why channel_id is
registered twice.  I do see it once in the
epan/dissectors/packet-tpncp.c and "channel_id" listed in the .dat file
- maybe that's it.

Could someone take a look at this?

Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]