Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] pidl license question
From: Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 23:04:37 +0100
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 04:57:36PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> If you like, I think we can add a clarification to the pidl output files 
> stating that we do not consider them derived works of pidl.

Thanks, that would be perfect. I've just added a statement to this
extent to the COPYING file of Wireshark, but having it in the generated
code would be even better.


Joerg Mayer                                           <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.