Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] About a faster wireshark

From: "Anders Broman" <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 07:10:10 +0200
Hi,
I'd say upload it to the wiki so it can be looked at,
The page(s) can always bee deleted later...
Regards
Anders

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Didier
Skickat: den 9 oktober 2007 06:31
Till: Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] About a faster wireshark

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:20:36 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote
> Hi,
> 
> One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability. 
> This proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific 
> hacks, contradicting this principle. So it will probably remain a
It's not, (ok there's four or five lines which are gcc/glibc).  

> seperate patch, not included in trunk. What do you propose on 
> maintenance of this patch? If it's not in trunk, I see no one 
I'm already doing it for a couple of years.
> picking it up and maintain it. There's another patch in the Wiki 
> (can you find it?) which I doubt anyone has used. What would be 
> great if usable portions could be extracted from your patch and 
> added to trunk. These will have to be portable though.

Well bugzilla doesn't like me (:

URL: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
undef error - Undefined subroutine Fh::slice at
data/template/template/en/default/global/hidden-fields.html.tmpl line 58

When trying to attach a one line patch.

Didier

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev