On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:20:36 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote
> One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability.
> This proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific
> hacks, contradicting this principle. So it will probably remain a
It's not, (ok there's four or five lines which are gcc/glibc).
> seperate patch, not included in trunk. What do you propose on
> maintenance of this patch? If it's not in trunk, I see no one
I'm already doing it for a couple of years.
> picking it up and maintain it. There's another patch in the Wiki
> (can you find it?) which I doubt anyone has used. What would be
> great if usable portions could be extracted from your patch and
> added to trunk. These will have to be portable though.
Well bugzilla doesn't like me (:
undef error - Undefined subroutine Fh::slice at
data/template/template/en/default/global/hidden-fields.html.tmpl line 58
When trying to attach a one line patch.