Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1785]New:packet-dcerpc-atsvc.c display
From: Joerg Mayer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:45:12 +0200
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 03:14:28PM -0400, Maynard, Chris wrote:
> Perhaps a compromise?  Like submitting a bug for each letter of the
> alphabet and list all dissectors affected beginning with that letter.
> This way, at most 26 bugs will be opened (apart from the ones I already
> opened)?  Then patches can be attached one at a time as they're fixed
> and only when the last one is attached can the bug be reviewed for
> checkin?  This will also mean that I can work on them in more manageable
> groups, and it will also let others know where I've left off in case
> someone else wants to assist with fixing these.

Sounds good to me! As long as there is only one patch per bug that will
need downloading/reviewing in the end.


Joerg Mayer                                           <[email protected]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.