Maynard, Chris wrote:
Hmm, I'm not sure he meant that, especially since Richard's follow-up
(http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200708/msg00432.html)
indicated that he wanted me to send patches for each one.
I am basically going down the alphabet here, tediously looking for
display filter fields that don't look right, then fixing them as I go.
I'm only on 'C' at the moment, so this is going to take awhile before
I'm done.
I don't think we'd realised you were going to do every dissector! As you
suggest, some sort of compromise is probably best...
Cheers,
Rich
