Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1785] New:packet-dcerpc-atsvc.c displa

From: "Luis EG Ontanon" <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:56:39 +0200
I guess Guy thought you were just to report them, not to provide patches.
I would go for a single patch.

On 8/23/07, Maynard, Chris <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That directly contradicts what Guy Harris asked me to do earlier, namely
> "I'd open bugs for each dissector (so we don't have to fix them all at
> once to close the bug).".  His thread in which he wrote that is here:
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200708/msg00432.html
>
> Can you guys please let me know how I should continue?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:37 PM
> To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1785]
> New:packet-dcerpc-atsvc.c display filter field problems
>
> > Please try not to open a bug for each and every problem of this type:
> > It makes it much more time intensive to review many many small patches
> > than a few bigger patches. It's also more work with bugzilla.
> >
> > Thanks for your work though!!!
> >
> >  ciao
> >       Joerg
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, retention,
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you
> are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
> recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
> copies of this message. Also, email is susceptible to data
> corruption, interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and
> viruses. We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are
> not liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering,
> amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>


-- 
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan