There still be the IP addresses in net_src/net_dst. It would be much
like M3UA does that replaces ip src and ip dst by the opc and dpc
(which I do not doubt it is ok).
What I wonder about is whether the GT is an address or should it be
just taken as a "port" on a certain address.
On 3/28/07, Abhik Sarkar <sarkar.abhik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In case of SUA, wouldn't this mean pinfo->src and pinfo->dst would no
longer have the IP end-points of the SCTP association? Is yes, is that
desirable?
On 3/28/07, Luis Ontanon <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Would it be correct to add an AT_SS7_GT to the address types and have
> sccp/sua setting the GTs as pinfo->src & pinfo->dst ???
>
> Isn't the global title an actual (transport) address?
>
> Luis
>
> --
> This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
> -- Marshall McLuhan
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
