Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:01:50PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:47:35PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
>> The alternative is to compile with -std=c99 for the long long case, but
>> do we really want to do that? I agree that -pedantic is a bit too much
>> to tackle, at least for now. Let's work on warnings with the usual
>> flags for now.
>
> No, the correct way to handle this is to turn off -Werror when this
> configure option is used. We really need to be c89 (or whatever)
> compliant until all the platforms that wireshark runs on have their
> compilers updated to be c99 compliant.
I've turned off --with-extra-gcc-checks on the Linux and OS X buildbots.
