Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Query on status of patches

From: "Douglas Pratley" <Douglas.pratley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:35:32 -0000
I have reintegrated my changes with the latest source, and resubmitted
my patches to the bugzilla:

[PATCH] User can select dissector based on packet matching display
filter 31/1/07 -> Bug 1443
[PATCH] TShark input and output options 15/02/2007 -> Bug 1444
[PATCH] Ability to provide a file that names networks / subnets -> Bug
1445

Cheers

Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
> Sent: 14 March 2007 15:08
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Query on status of patches
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:58:26AM +0100, Sake Blok wrote:
> > I have not seen many
> > patches being overlooked actually. There were the occasions where a 
> > review lasted a little longer, but most patches were 
> commited within a 
> > couple of days. Maybe a patch-tracking system is a little overkill. 
> > The majority of patches seem to be easy to review and commit.
> 
> Something that we have (sort of) promoted in the past was the 
> following:
> Submit your patch to the ml. In case the patch isn't 
> committed/nacked within 3-4 days then open a bug and attach 
> the patch to the bug. This way the patch won't get lost and 
> we don't have the management overhead of tracking all the 
> patches in the bugtracking system. 
> 
>  ciao
>       Joerg
> -- 
> Joerg Mayer                                           
> <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just 
> stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead 
> of technology.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> 



This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in hard copy by an authorised signatory.  The contents of this email may relate to dealings with other companies within the Detica Group plc group of companies.

Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451.

Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7YP, England.