Out of curiosity, what sort of changes are we interested in making in
the current API?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:12:07AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1199
>
> ------- Comment #3 from guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-10 00:12 GMT -------
> Note that we do not yet have a dissector API to which I'd be willing
> to commit, so including this patch does not constitute making this an
> official published API.
>
> If that's acceptable for now (eventually, we *do* want to have a
> published API for plugin dissectors, but there are some changes to the
> current API that we'd like to make), this patch would be OK as long as
> it works with any UN*X (and if it can also work with Windows, that'd
> be even better).
>
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-bugs mailing list
> Wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-bugs
