Guy Harris schrieb:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Any objections against this (in my eyes cleaner) solution?
Somebody asked about this in 2004:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/ethereal-dev/200405/msg06091.html
but I'm not sure why, given the answer:
http://www.wireshark.org/lists/ethereal-dev/200405/msg06093.html
that wasn't done.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
At that time, I worked on getting rid of the old plugin api stuff.
Creating a def file based on the files for the old plugin api stuff was
quite easy. The solution with __declspec would have been the next step
but it would have meant some extra work for me and I was satisfied with
the def file solution.
BTW, I'd like to thank all people who continue to contribute so much
work and time to Wireshark. I wish I had some time left to work on
Wireshark improvements and bugfixes. I still use Wireshark every day in
my work and it is definitively the most valuable tool to me.
BTW, finally I don't need to maintain a parallel installation of MSVC6
and MSVC2005 on my laptop anymore and can deinstall MSVC6. Thanks.
Regards,
Lars
