Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20442:/trunk/tools/lemon/ /trunk/tools/lemon/: lemon.c

["Douglas Pratley" <Douglas.pratley@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the quick response (and the suggested work-around). This now
seems to work for me.

Cheers


Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luis Ontanon
Sent: 16 January 2007 16:56
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev
20442:/trunk/tools/lemon/ /trunk/tools/lemon/: lemon.c

Guys,
 I checked in r20452 that reverses the changes they did to my original
fix (and I checked in later). This fix is not quite perfect (neither
was theirs) as it haves meany #line directives ponting at the wrong
place in the generated code, but it does have yy_destructor() to be
called just once for every unused element in RHS.


I'm curious so I'll keep investigating this issue...
Luis

On 1/16/07, Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is this useful?
>
> Martin
>
> GNU gdb 6.2.1
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
details.
> This GDB was configured as "i586-suse-linux"...Using host libthread_db
> library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
>
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /users/martinm/wireshark/.libs/lt-wireshark
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> [New Thread 1103262656 (LWP 23272)]
> Detaching after fork from child process 23283.
> Detaching after fork from child process 23284.
> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x085761d0 ***
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 1103262656 (LWP 23272)]
> 0x41957ec9 in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x41957ec9 in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> #1  0x417b89d2 in g_free () from /opt/gnome/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> #2  0x4037f192 in yy_destructor (yymajor=107 'k', yypminor=0x8587430)
> at dtd_grammar.lemon:63
> #3  0x4037f993 in DtdParse (yyp=0x85873b0, yymajor=16,
> yyminor=0x6c696d6b, bd=0x6c696d6b) at dtd_grammar.lemon:216
> #4  0x40380986 in Dtd_Parse_lex () at dtd_parse.l:274
> #5  0x4038143c in dtd_parse (s=0x6c696d6b) at dtd_parse.l:334
> #6  0x40a30056 in proto_register_xml () at packet-xml.c:1145
> #7  0x40a3788e in register_all_protocols () at register.c:691
> #8  0x403993ff in proto_init (register_all_protocols=0x805fe8c
> <register_all_protocols>, register_all_protocol_handoffs=0x8060e3c
> <register_all_protocol_handoffs>)
>     at proto.c:320
> #9  0x40384337 in epan_init (register_all_protocols=0x6c696d6b,
> register_all_handoffs=0x6c696d6b, report_failure=0x6c696d6b,
> report_open_failure=0x6c696d6b,
>     report_read_failure=0x6c696d6b) at epan.c:97
> #10 0x080826db in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfffdad4) at main.c:2367
> (gdb) fr 2
> #2  0x4037f192 in yy_destructor (yymajor=107 'k', yypminor=0x8587430)
> at dtd_grammar.lemon:63
> 63                      if ($$->text) g_free($$->text);
> (gdb) p *yyminor
> No symbol "yyminor" in current context.
> (gdb) p *yypminor
> $1 = {yy0 = 0x8583d38, yy29 = 0x8583d38, yy44 = 0x8583d38
> "smil8=X\b:10", yy59 = 0x8583d38, yy81 = 140000568}
> (gdb)
>
> On 1/16/07, Luis Ontanon <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > They commited what we got in rev 20447.
> >
> > As this does not happen to me (I'm running with MallocBadFreeAbort)
I
> > would need a a backtrace where the yyminor value passed to
DtdParse()
> > shows up.
> >
> > can you -DDEBUG_DTD_PARSER and send in the trace for the parser.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Luis
> >
> > On 1/16/07, Douglas Pratley <Douglas.pratley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I get a similar crash under Windows. I'm having trouble reverting
back
> > > to a "good" baseline without losing today's work, so it would be
great
> > > if this could be fixed... I'm afraid I can't work out quite what
the
> > > dependencies are here.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Doug
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap
Keuter
> > > Sent: 16 January 2007 12:27
> > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 20442:
> > > /trunk/tools/lemon/ /trunk/tools/lemon/: lemon.c
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Maybe not, since it seems to have broken the program completely.
> > >
> > > (gdb) run
> > > Starting program: /home/me/src/wireshark/trunk/.libs/lt-tshark
> > > Failed to read a valid object file image from memory.
> > > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> > > [New Thread -1233094432 (LWP 25812)]
> > >
> > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > [Switching to Thread -1233094432 (LWP 25812)]
> > > 0xb69c75ad in free () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0  0xb69c75ad in free () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> > > #1  0xb6b3ab31 in g_free () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> > > #2  0xb6fafa13 in yy_destructor (yymajor=<value optimized out>,
> > > yypminor=0x0) at ./dtd_grammar.lemon:63
> > > #3  0xb6fb0685 in DtdParse (yyp=0x8371f40, yymajor=6,
yyminor=0x8376f00,
> > > bd=0x8378888) at ./dtd_grammar.lemon:1
> > > #4  0xb6fb163b in Dtd_Parse_lex () at ./dtd_parse.l:275
> > > #5  0xb6fb221c in dtd_parse (s=0x8378f20) at ./dtd_parse.l:335
> > > #6  0xb76620f5 in proto_register_xml () at packet-xml.c:1145
> > > #7  0xb766b3b5 in register_all_protocols () at register.c:691
> > > #8  0xb6fcd66f in proto_init (register_all_protocols=0x804e31c
> > > <register_all_protocols@plt>,
> > >     register_all_protocol_handoffs=0x804e75c
> > > <register_all_protocol_handoffs@plt>) at proto.c:320
> > > #9  0xb6fb60d7 in epan_init (register_all_protocols=0x804e31c
> > > <register_all_protocols@plt>,
> > >     register_all_handoffs=0x804e75c
> > > <register_all_protocol_handoffs@plt>, report_failure=0x8060dc0
> > > <failure_message>,
> > >     report_open_failure=0x80610a0 <open_failure_message>,
> > > report_read_failure=0x8061150 <read_failure_message>) at epan.c:97
> > > #10 0x08062fc1 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbf80a4d4) at tshark.c:781
> > >
> > > Thanx,
> > > Jaap
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 07:48:06PM +0000, lego@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20442
> > > > >
> > > > > User: lego
> > > > > Date: 2007/01/15 07:48 PM
> > > > >
> > > > > Log:
> > > > >  Fix a major leakage of token minors in lemon generated
parsers due
> > > to the fact that lemon was not genmerating destructor code for
elements
> > > in the RHS of rules without C-code.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can you please provide feedback to the lemon author?
> > > >
> > > >  thanks
> > > >        Joerg
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This message should be regarded as confidential. If you have
received this
> > email in error please notify the sender and destroy it immediately.
> > > Statements of intent shall only become binding when confirmed in
hard copy
> > by an authorised signatory.  The contents of this email may relate
to
> > dealings with other companies within the Detica Group plc group of
> > companies.
> > >
> > > Detica Limited is registered in England under No: 1337451.
> > >
> > > Registered offices: Surrey Research Park, Guildford, Surrey, GU2
7YP,
> > England.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy
yourself.
> > -- Marshall McLuhan
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>


-- 
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy
yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev