Hi,
I had a brief look some time ago and it looked
To me like it would require new FT_x:s or
That the macros VAL and TFS would have to be changed to supply
the needed functions. Is there a better way to do it?
BR
Anders
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Jaap Keuter
Skickat: den 12 januari 2007 15:48
Till: Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto_tree_add_item() with range_string
Hi,
Yeah, that would be nice, having stuff like this:
static const range_string rs_value[] = {
{ 0, 49, "Little" },
{ 50, 99, "Some" },
{100,199, "Considerable" },
{200,255, "High" },
{ 0, 0, NULL }
};
proto_tree_add_item(tree, hf_proto_value, tvb, offset, 1, FALSE);
static hf_register_info hf[] = {
{ &hf_proto_value,
{ "Value", "proto.value",
FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC,
RS(rs_value), 0x0,
"How much is it worth", HFILL }}
};
+ Frame
+ Ethernet II
+ IP
+ TCP
+ Proto
Value: High (220)
That would require weaving in the range string handling along the types
where VALS() and TFS() handling applies (FT_*INT*, and FT_BOOLEAN).
epan/proto.c comes to mind.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> Does some have an idea on how to implement proto_tree_add_item() with a
> range_string?
> That would be really useful.
> BR
> Anders
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
