ronnie,
You should take a look at this capture. These out-if-order packets
look to me more like retransmissions.
L,
It appears that 192.168.70.42 transmits twice every TCP packet.
What's the cause I can't tell but that's certainly a problem of that
box. Try disabling the firewall if you have it and see if it still
happens.
On 1/12/07, L SB <lmsaeb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is the capture from the PC I am having so many out of order packets
from. If anyone is kin enough to take a peak and maybe save my sanity, I
would be forever grateful.
As you can see it is happening with multiple destinations.
I have ruled out faulty nics, the network connection and even the PC itself
(swapped the harddrive into a new machine).
My only other step is to just reformat the PC???
>From: "L SB" <lmsaeb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: Community support list for Wireshark
><wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP out of order segments
>Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:04:29 -0500
>
>I did some more testing and it is only happening on one PC. I have tried
>changing network cards and even the motherboad and a new network
>connection.
>At this point, it seems to be software related. Do you think LANMAN could
>cause this flood of out of segment packets?
>
>
> >From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: frnkblk@xxxxxxxxx,Community support list for Wireshark
> ><wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: "'Community support list for Wireshark'"
> ><wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP out of order segments
> >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:41:04 -0600
> >
> >You'll want to do a packet trace of the transmitting computer and see if
> >they're being sent out on an orderly basis.
> >
> >Frank
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen
>Fisher
> >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:50 AM
> >To: Community support list for Wireshark
> >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] TCP out of order segments
> >
> >On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 03:10:46AM -0500, L SB wrote:
> >
> > > Would asymmetric routing be a problem if the machines exist on the
> > > same subnet?
> >
> >No, since there is no routing going on there.
> >
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Wireshark-users mailing list
> >Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Wireshark-users mailing list
> >Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>From photos to predictions, The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden Globes
>has
>it all. http://tv.msn.com/tv/globes2007/?icid=nctagline1
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wireshark-users mailing list
>Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
_________________________________________________________________
Fixing up the home? Live Search can help
http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
