Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Porting Wireshark to Mac OS X
From: Stephen Fisher <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:18:57 -0800
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:28:48PM +0100, Romain Goyet wrote:

> -> Build GTK+ and its dependencies, and then run Wireshark under 
> Apple's X11. That works just fine, but it's a pain in the *** to 
> build. It takes forever, you have to keep tweaking makefiles, etc... 
> For the average hacker, it's doable, but it's absolutely impossible 
> for a typical user.

Typical users are best off using packages from MacPorts (DarwinPorts) or 
Fink, although they still need to install X11.

> -> Use the Quartz port of GTK+. This is a pretty good option. But it 
> has two drawbacks : first, the UI is still grey-ish, and really 
> doesn't fit well with other Aqua apps. That's just a visual problem, 
> but that does matter. Secondly, this port of GTK+ is still a very 
> early port, and it's pretty buggy. Anyway, its author himself says 
> it's not ready for production yet.

This may be worth waiting for instead of spending countless hours 
porting Wireshark.  You have tried the Quartz port of GTK then?  I keep 
meaning to try it out to see how it is.  A nice thing about being GTK on 
all platforms is that it makes it easier for all of us to keep the code 
up to date without learning GUI programming on each OS :) <although we 
do already use some native code, such as the Windows file selection 

> So, what do you guys think ? I'd be willing to help make a native Mac
> OS X GUI for WireShark, but I don't know wether it's really worth it.

In addition to the issue that Guy brought up, a problem that comes up 
when porting X/GTK applications to the native OS X GUI is that X/GTK and 
Windows applications often use menus in each sub-window that pops up and 
OS X wants you to use a single menu bar at the top.

Emacs has successfully created a GTK and native OS X GUI (among others) 
to choose from.  I love my OS X applications, but I actually prefer the 
X11 port of it on my Mac.  Maybe that's just because I use it under X on 
other platforms.

I can't speak for the other developers, but personally I think yours and 
our time would be better spent on other Wireshark features.