Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Malformed packets in CORBA protocol plugin
From: Guy Harris <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:50:51 -0800
On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:40 AM, [email protected] wrote:

Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote on 11/12/2006 18:50:43:

It *is* designed to cope with offset beyond the buffer length - an
offset beyond the buffer length is an obvious error, so it throws an

Except in this case it is not an error.
Yes, it is.  It makes no sense whatsoever to add a protocol tree item  
that refers to data past the end of the packet, as that data doesn't  
exist.  It's designed to cope with the offset being beyond the buffer  
length by throwing an exception to report an error.  If the packet  
isn't erroneous, then the bug isn't that proto_tree_add_item() isn't  
doing what it should be doing (it's doing exactly what it should be  
doing), it's that it shouldn't be called with that offset in the first