Den 11. des. 2006 kl. 19.24 skrev Richard van der Hoff:
The difference between your table and the one in crc16.h is the
setting
of the "reverse" flag - essentially whether bits are shifted right or
left as the crc calculation progresses.
Thank you for your clarification.
I think I will implement crc16_x25_unreflected() and crc16_x25_ccitt(),
as my table is used a bit different than in crc16_unreflected():
while (len--)
crc16 = table[((crc16 >> 8) ^ *buf++) & 0xff] ^ (crc16 << 8);
--
Stig Bjørlykke
