ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [resend]MMS dissector bug?

From: "Anders Broman" <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:53:12 +0100
Hi,
That section was added on request. I have forgotten the reason.
But I think it was discussed on the mailing list.

The original ASN1 can be found at:
http://www.sisconet.com/downloads/mms_abstract_syntax.txt

BR
Anders
P.S
The check in message was:

Revision 18974 - (view) (download) (as text) - [select for diffs] 
Modified Mon Aug 21 13:32:07 2006 UTC (3 months ago) by sahlberg 
File length: 67109 byte(s) 
Diff to previous 18214 
 from Angel de Juan

make mms bitstrings easier to read


--
Hi, this is my new mms with some changes in order to display some data in
binary instead of hex.

Excuse me because is not a diff from the repository, but I don't know how to
create a diff.

I also have the compiled packet-mms.c and packet-mms.h if you want it only
mail me.


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Stephen Fisher
Skickat: den 21 november 2006 00:40
Till: Steven.Schaeffer@xxxxxxx; Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [resend]MMS dissector bug?

On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 11:59:32AM -0700, Steve Schaeffer wrote:

> It seems to me that an 8-bit "bit-string" should only show 8 entries 
> in the packet details, not 512 as in packet #497 in the attachment to 
> bug #1229:
>                         success: bit-string (4)
>                             Padding: 3
>                             bit-string: 80 (offset0)
>                                 1... .... = offset0: True

>                                 .... ...0 = offset511: False

I'm not familiar with the protocol, but it looks like all 512 are hard 
coded into the dissector.  Does the bit-string need to be only 8 bits 
long?  Do you have access to the standards documents by chance?


Steve

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev