On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
> > Any comments?
>
> As long as all versions of glib we'll be using support the %ll
> versions in the g_*printf routines, or define PRI...64 equivalents
> that work with those routines, that sounds like the right solution.
Ack.
> If the "don't use these routines" testing we're looking at for ntoh*
> and hton* works, we could extend it to check for sprintf (which nobody
> should be using anyway!) and snprintf (the removal of references to
> which would let us get rid of the copy we have).
We've dropped that copy already.
Thanx,
Jaap
