Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Remove the PRI...64 macros completely?
From: Jaap Keuter <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:06:09 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Guy Harris wrote:

> On Nov 17, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> > Any comments?
> As long as all versions of glib we'll be using support the %ll
> versions in the g_*printf routines, or define PRI...64 equivalents
> that work with those routines, that sounds like the right solution.


> If the "don't use these routines" testing we're looking at for ntoh*
> and hton* works, we could extend it to check for sprintf (which nobody
> should be using anyway!) and snprintf (the removal of references to
> which would let us get rid of the copy we have).

We've dropped that copy already.