I have got the same idea meantime.
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LEGO
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:33 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] COPY_ADDRESS and g_malloc()
may be we should have EP_COPY_ADDRESS, SE_COPY_ADDRESS and
On 11/13/06, Kukosa, Tomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> does not it make sence to change g_malloc() in COPY_ADDRESS to
> se_alloc() ?
> It seems that it is not freed in most cases of usage.
> Do wee need anywhere longer lifetime then se_alloc() has?
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy
-- Marshall McLuhan
Wireshark-dev mailing list