Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] COPY_ADDRESS and g_malloc()
From: "Kukosa, Tomas" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:36:24 +0100
I have got the same idea meantime.

T. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LEGO
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:33 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] COPY_ADDRESS and g_malloc()

may be we should have EP_COPY_ADDRESS, SE_COPY_ADDRESS and
PE_COPY_ADDRESS instead.


On 11/13/06, Kukosa, Tomas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> does not it make sence to change g_malloc() in COPY_ADDRESS to
> se_alloc() ?
> It seems that it is not freed in most cases of usage.
> Do wee need anywhere longer lifetime then se_alloc() has?
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>


-- 
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy
yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev