Wireshark-dev: [Wireshark-dev] COPY_ADDRESS and g_malloc()
From: "Kukosa, Tomas" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:25:39 +0100
Hi,

does not it make sence to change g_malloc() in COPY_ADDRESS to
se_alloc() ?
It seems that it is not freed in most cases of usage.
Do wee need anywhere longer lifetime then se_alloc() has?

Tomas