Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]

ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:59:42 -0800

ronnie sahlberg wrote:

checked in


So why is there a union with only one member?  Is that for future expansion?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
  - From: ronnie sahlberg

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
  - From: Albert Chin
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
  - From: ronnie sahlberg

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 19777: /trunk/ /trunk/: capture-pcap-util.c capture_loop.c capture_opts.c dumpcap.c
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] net-snmp modules missing?
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Use of anonymous union in epan/dissectors/packet-usb.[ch]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube