> Hi,
>
> Why not adding 129 as allowed channel number?
> Please supply patch as attachment for easy handling.
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
Hi Jaap,
thanks for your feedback. Initially I just changed the number from 30 to
129, but then I thought what happens if we add additional channels
again? Should we keep on patching on and on?
So I removed the test, since it is not helping in any way.
Please find the patch attached.
thanks a lot,
Rolf
Index: wiretap/eyesdn.c
===================================================================
--- wiretap/eyesdn.c (Revision 19336)
+++ wiretap/eyesdn.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -260,13 +260,6 @@
pkt_len = (pkt_len << 8) | ((unsigned long) hdr[11]);
/* sanity checks */
- if(channel>30) {
- *err = WTAP_ERR_BAD_RECORD;
- *err_info = g_strdup_printf("eyesdn: bad channel number %u",
- channel);
- return -1;
- }
-
if(direction>1) {
*err = WTAP_ERR_BAD_RECORD;
*err_info = g_strdup_printf("eyesdn: bad direction value %u",
