Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New radius attributes (RFC 4590)

From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:59:32 +0200 (CEST)
Hi,

Well, you can file an errata with rfc editor There doesn't seem to be one
for RFC 4590 yet. All in all the table 2 in RFC 4590 matches IANA
registration, so we'll keep it this way.

Thanx,
Jaap

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Alexander Schrab wrote:

> There is actually an error in RFC 4590! Part of the problem was mine (I
> mixed up response and response-auth). But in the table the response-auth
> (107) comes after nextnonce (106). In the description (which I looked
> at) of the attributes they are reversed. The correct order ccording to
> IANA is the one in the table.
>
> I wonder if the authors are aware of the problem.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > Alexander Schrab
> > Sent: den 21 september 2006 07:49
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New radius attributes (RFC 4590)
> >
> >
> > I am sorry for that mistake, I guess I was to eager. Anyhow,
> > now you are aware of thenew RFC :)
> >
> > /Alex
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > Jaap Keuter
> > > Sent: den 20 september 2006 16:28
> > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New radius attributes (RFC 4590)
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Too bad, since the patch doesn't match RFC 4590 table 2.
> > > Care to fix it?
> > >
> > > Thanx,
> > > Jaap
> > >
> > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Did anyone fix this?
> > > >
> > > > Committed revision 19266.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >        Joerg
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>