ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-commits: [Wireshark-commits] rev 42778: /trunk/ui/gtk/ /trunk/ui/gtk/: main_menubar.c

Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:44:55 GMT
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=42778

User: guy
Date: 2012/05/22 04:44 AM

Log:
 Replace the File -> Export menu with separate:
 
 	File -> Export Packet Dissections
 
 	    (for the "print to file", "export as CSV", "export as C array",
 	    "export as PSML", and "export as PDML" items)
 
 	File-> Export Selected Packet Bytes
 
 	File -> Export SSL Session Keys
 
 	File -> Export Objects
 
 	    (for exporting objects transferred over HTTP, DICOM, or SMB)
 
 menu items.
 
 The operations under Export really weren't that related - about all they
 had in common was that they wrote to a file stuff other than packets
 in a capture file format; the operations in the groups *under* Export
 were related, so the groups are now menu items of their own.
 
 This way, the File menu more immediately indicates what options of that
 sort are available.
 
 It also means that the Export Packet Dissections item might make it
 clearer that what you get from that is *NOT* something that can just be
 read back into Wireshark, as at least one user who asked "how do I get
 my capture back from this?" on ask.wireshark.com thought.  If that
 doesn't suffice, perhaps renaming it to "Export Dissected Packets" would
 help; if *that* doesn't suffice, perhaps Kevin Cullimore's suggestion
 that it say "Report" rather than "Export" will do the trick:
 
 	From: Kevin Cullimore <kcullimo@xxxxxxxxxx>
 	Subject: [Wireshark-users] Re: Should the "export as text" item be in an "Export Human-readable..." item in the File menu?
 	Date: May 19, 2012 8:31:23 PM PDT
 	To: wireshark-users <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
 	Would classifying the asymmetric export (ones that lack a
 	corresponding "import" action) formats as "reports" help clear
 	up the original ambiguity/misunderstanding? It seems that most
 	of the gui-based network tools I'm forced to periodically
 	interact with rely upon that term with at least some success.
 
 (Or perhaps some other verb would be right in some cases, e.g. "Save SSL
 Session Keys".)
 
 This also sets a pattern for another upcoming change - splitting "Save
 As" into "Save As", which always saves every packet and makes the new
 file the current file, and "{Verb} Specified Packets", which lets you
 specify which packets to save and does *not* make the new file the
 current file.  That'd simplify the code a bit, and might clear up the
 new only-in-the-trunk issue in bug 6640 - having "Save As" default to
 saving displayed packets currently means that it acts more like the
 latter of those functions.

Directory: /trunk/ui/gtk/
  Changes    Path              Action
  +79 -70    main_menubar.c    Modified