Comment # 9
on bug 12184
from Peter Wu
At the moment it looks like a misunderstanding of the intended functionality.
The important point is that Every and Strict perform pair-wise matching,
returning a result AVPL with a length of at most the number of condition AVPs.
This means that a documentation update is necessary, but the functionality
should probably be preserved. Can you review the commit message at
https://code.wireshark.org/review/17777 for inaccuracies?
As for your test cases, you have to modify it as follows for the expected
result:
Transform show_loose {
// Does not work because "Loose" always matches
//Match Loose (rsp_code!100,con_type) Replace (loose=1);
// Instead use this, it will return on a successful match:
Match Strict (con_type) Replace (loose=1);
Match Strict (rsp_code!100) Replace (loose=1);
};
The Every case is now also fixed in the patch by using sorting by string value
instead of by a random memory address.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
