Comment # 8
on bug 12103
from Anders Broman
(In reply to julien STAUB from comment #7)
> Thank you for that, I would not have found that alone. I have two additional
> questions:
> - will this solution be improved to not have this manual operation ?
> - do you know who did the nordic_BLE port into wireshark ? I suppose (s)he
> used the pluggin diddesctor source from Nordic, do you know if (s)he used
> the source for 1.10.x or 1.12.x as 1.12.x seems to have dissection problems
> (https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/question/79845/nrf-sniffer-support-for-
> wireshark-v203/#90306)
Hi,
I did the BLE port to wireshark using the code in folder
\ble-sniffer_win_1.0.1.zip\Sniffer\plugins\1.12
As the ble-sniffer code is just 726 lines of code i doubt the "problems"
reported are with the sniffer code it self but rather with the interworking
with the rest of the Wireshark bluetooth code. To me the best way forward would
be to sue this code and sort out any problems with it. Note that a few things
has been changed in the code compared with the original code so it might work
better now. The linked Q&A talks of some problems butthere is no bug references
so it's not possible to follow up on that. For what it's worth the sample trace
I worked on seems to work well.
Regards
Anders
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
