Comment # 3
on bug 12205
from João Valverde
(In reply to Michael Mann from comment #2)
> This was caused by Idc101cd866b6d4f13500c9d59da5c7a38847fb7f. Not sure if
> dissector or address commit is wrong.
> I really don't like the dissector using AT_NONE but having a value in it, so
> I would probably lean towards dissector.
Haven't looked at the code yet but we probably need to be less restrictive when
copying AT_NONE in alloc_address_wmem (or fix the dissectors not to use it).
I meant to make that change even before this crash before I was thinking that
it had a high chance of breaking something (with dissectors trying to copy
AT_NONE).
Will push the change to Gerrit.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
