Comment # 23
on bug 10122
from Jeff Morriss
(In reply to Evan Huus from comment #19)
> I don't mind bumping the valgrind time limit even more - it's there
> primarily to catch infinite-loops, and those aren't valgrind-specific so
> it's very unlikely that we'd actually find an infinite-loop case during a
> valgrind run that wouldn't be caught by the normal fuzz run first.
>
> Currently, normal fuzzing limits to 5min and valgrind fuzzing to 12.5min.
> Gerald, do we know how long these captures would actually take when run
> under valgrind on the current fuzz-bot?
It took 9.5 minutes on my i7-3770S CPU @ 3.10GHz. If the fuzz-bot is running
closer to 2GHz it should be on the order of 14-15 minutes.
I'd agree that upping the limit is reasonable: the loops will be caught by the
regular fuzz testing. The only other alternative is to remove all the large
files from the menagerie.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
