Comment # 7
on bug 7263
from Jeff Morriss
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hello,
>
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > I think only allowing comparison of fields of the same time is reasonable.
> > And we have it for some time now. Closing this one...
>
> Right now I don't have any wireshark installed and can't test, but
> I think comment #2 is still valid.
>
> (Just looking at current sources cflow.timeend is FT_RELATIVE_TIME, and
> cflow.sysuptime is FT_UINT32)
Sure but... Oh, OK, I see, the request in this bug is the same as what is
described in comment #2. So while comparing fields has been added, comparing
the fields requested here is not.
OK, so I checked in a simple solution (only for this field) in r52821 : I made
cflow.sysuptime an FT_RELATIVE_TIME. So instead of showing the user
milliseconds we show them seconds (I don't imagine anyone will care) and it
allows comparison with the timend field.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
