Wireshark · Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9199] edns0 "Higher bits in extended RCODE" incorrectly decoded in packet-dns.

ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
July 17th, 2024 | 10:00am-11:55am SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9199] edns0 "Higher bits in extended RCODE" incorrectly de

From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:55:06 +0000

Comment # 3 on bug 9199 from Stefan Paletta

Forgot to mention: test case is the second packet. Has bits set to 0xff, but
dissector interprets as 0xf0.

You are receiving this mail because:

You are watching all bug changes.

References:
- [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9199] New: edns0 "Higher bits in extended RCODE" incorrectly decoded in packet-dns.c
  - From: bugzilla-daemon

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9199] edns0 "Higher bits in extended RCODE" incorrectly decoded in packet-dns.c
Next by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9201] Compilation warnings
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9199] edns0 "Higher bits in extended RCODE" incorrectly decoded in packet-dns.c
Next by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 7050] Lack of support for multiple sub-TLV of sub-tlv for Vendor-Specific -> WiMAX TLV -> WiMAX sub-tlv ->WiMAX sub-tlv ..........
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube