Comment # 22
on bug 8947
from Simon Zhong
> My question was more "If a handle is required to do request/response
> matching, does it make more sense to put the request/response fields under
> the Handle object, rather than outside of it?" Pushing opcode/is_solicited
> was just referring to the values (passed into the subfunctions), not the
> fields themselves (which I agree should be left as is).
Some Op Code, e.g. 9 (KA), doesn't have handle object, but we can still match
request/response(see packet 1/2 in fuzz test pcap file), so I think it's better
to keep the request/response field at current level.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
