Comment # 9
on bug 8590
from Brandon
Is there something I can do to help? I'm still new to the codebase, but I have
time to assist.
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > It's been ~2 months. What (if anything) was decided here?
>
> It looks, more or less, as if we somewhat converged on the approach I
> proposed:
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201304/msg00162.html
>
> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201304/msg00170.html
>
> in which libwiretap provides "records" rather than "packets", with some
> records being provided in a standardized format (such as records containing
> packets) and others being provided in capture-file-format-specific form, and
> code running atop libwiretap, such as libwireshark, supporting a table into
> which libwiretap routines or plugin routines could register to handle
> particular record types.
>
> I'm currently working on some infrastructural changes to support that.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
