Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 8908] Strange behavior of tree expand/collapse in packet d

Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:17:03 +0000

Comment # 5 on bug 8908 from
(In reply to comment #3)
> Fixed regression in 50479 when I find some more time I'll backport it to 1.10

Nice, thanks!

> Still one case is left:
>  - packet #1, expand TCP header, expand Flags, collapse TCP header, expand
> TCP header -> Flags are not expanded

Hmm, that seems like a bug too (even though it was like that in 1.8).

> To be honest patch for this is quite simple:
> 
> @@ -216,6 +218,11 @@ expand_tree(GtkTreeView *tree_view, GtkTreeIter *iter,
>       */
>      if (finfo->tree_type != -1)
>         tree_expanded_set(finfo->tree_type, TRUE);
> +
> +    /* after expanding we might also need to expand child. */
> +    g_signal_handlers_block_by_func(tree_view, expand_tree, NULL);
> +    expand_finfos(tree_view, model, path, iter, FALSE);
> +    g_signal_handlers_unblock_by_func(tree_view, expand_tree, NULL);
>  }
> 
> 
> But I'm not 100% sure if we want to do it.
> I've tested this for XML, where almost all subtrees share the same ett
> number,
> and it looks not so great.

That's a bug in the XML dissector ;-).  Seriously, though, the behavior desired
in this bug is the whole purpose of having more than one ett number.


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.