Comment # 10
on bug 8089
from Chris Bontje
Evan, Alexis
Thank-you for the comments, I've applied both of your notes & suggestions to
the source files and have uploaded a revised copy (it passes the "check"
functions now).
Regarding the possible memory leak in the fmconfig_frame_fast function, I don't
think I'll be able to implement those changes barring a specific example I
could be pointed to? The fmconfig_frame_fast function was a modification of an
existing function I found in packet-synphasor.c (config_frame_fast at Line
309). Does either of you have an idea of a protocol that would have one or
more "definition/config" frames and then followup "data" frames that refer
back?
Thanks, Chris
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are watching all bug changes.
