https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7639
Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--- Comment #17 from Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-08-20 16:20:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Michal and Michael (this is going to get confusing :P),
> I wasn't questioning the validity of patch 1/9 (in fact, I think it's probably
> a good idea).
I think the standard argument is that inevitably a dissector will fall into
multiple folder groups leading to more confusion. I like the idea too, but
realize the can of worms it will open. I'm sure its been discussed on the
wireshark-dev mailing list before.
> The concept of dissectors that are both plugins and built-in is a very
> interesting one that I think is worth discussing further.
Yes that part I'm interested in as well for the balance between "quick release"
that a plugin gives you (that dissector developers want) and the "permanence"
of the built-in (that the wireshark maintainers need)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
