https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6787
--- Comment #16 from FF <francesco.fondelli@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-07-28 08:44:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> FF:
Hi Bill,
> There are two cases (see below) wherein the dissector does a 'return 0' which
> seem incorrect to me. (The 3rd case of 'return 0' is redundant).
agree
[cut]
> (Not the most earthshaking issue),
:-)
> but what do you think ? (See below for my suggested changes).
[cut]
agree with your suggestions
I cooked a patch, attachment 8853.
thank you
ciao
FF
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
